Skip to main content

Your Pet in a Separation or Divorce

Your Dear Pet and Family Law 

Deciding who will keep which pet can be an issue in a divorce

You've had a long and hard day. As soon as you walk in the door, there's your dog there to great you and so happy to see you. It's like therapy.

But when two people separate, they will have to negotiate who gets certain property in the division or equalization of their assets. If they can’t agree, a court will decide. 

The question comes up, Who gets the dog? If there’s more than one, Who gets which dog? And so on for whatever beloved pet or animal that we have had during the relationship.

We have such a strong emotional connection with our pets. This is one more stressful aspect to layer on to the other aspects of separation and divorce that people have to deal with.

The emotional support that one gets from their pet may be a major coping mechanism to see them through the divorce.


Legal Status of Animals in Ontario

In the eyes of the law, pets are personal property.

There are laws that govern how we are to treat pets or how many we are permitted to have. But the main question a court asks is, who owns the pet?

One way a court would look at this question is by asking, Who bought the pet? Where's the receipt?

The second way a court might approach this is with a very broad set of questions, such as, Did one person bring the pet into the relationship? Did the two people make a cohabitation agreement or a pre-nuptial marriage contract regarding the pets? Who paid the veterinarian bills? Who cared for the pet? Who walked it?


A Case of Two Dogs

In a motion decision in 2021, Coats v Dickson, the separating couple owned two black Labrador retrievers: Jazz and Jetta. Not surprisingly, the couple couldn’t agree on who would take which dog. The Court took the very broad approach to addressing ownership. 

It acknowledged the therapeutic effect on the parties of having a dog. It noted that each party had more or less equal part in looking after the animal. On a broad analysis it concluded that both dogs were jointly owned. So, it awarded each party one dog each. (Read more about motions.)



What Can You Do?

As two people are separating, they can include who gets the pets in their separation agreement, but this assumes that they can agree in a time of their lives when they have many other negative emotions toward each other and various things have happened that are destructive to parties ability to agree. 

Another way is to think ahead by making a cohabitation agreement (for people who are living common law), or make a marriage contract (pre- or post-wedding) for those who are getting married, specifying who has ownership and care of the pet and who would keep it in the event of a break up. (Read more about marriage contracts.)



Resources

Find a family law lawyer to discuss this topic

London (Middlesex) Courthouse

St. Thomas (Elgin) Courthouse

Sarnia (Lambton) Courthouse

Woodstock (Oxford) Courthouse



Labels:
Location: London, ON, Canada

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coming to a Court Near You: Dogimony for "Companion Animals"

New BC Law Changes How Pets Are Divided Up in Divorce & Family Law Cases Yesterday I had the pleasure of accepting Kristy Cameron's invitation to join her on her radio show in Ottawa to weigh in on the recent changes to the Family Law Act in British Columbia . You can find her show at iHeart Radio 580 CFRA News Talk Radio . One of my favourite parts of the show was when Kristy and her producer Chris coined the word "dogimony." It was on the topic of how the ownership and possession of pets is now decided in British Columbia courts. Photo credit: Yuliya Strizhkina. A pet's best interests are now one of the principles a BC judge must consider when deciding which party gets ownership and possession of the companion animal. The relationship a child has with the pet and the relationship the other spouse has are also required considerations. It's like a combined best interest of the pet + stakeholder principle.  What are the changes in s 92 and s 97 of BC’s Family L...
Post a Comment
Read more

A New Path to Resolving Disputes: Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution

Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution Recently, I attended an opening of the courts ceremony in London where judges of the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice were speaking. The local administrative judge for London updated the audience and said that the London family court branch would soon begin piloting an innovative way to move certain cases toward resolution.  Photo credit: Tyler Lastovich It’s called binding judicial dispute resolution (Binding JDR). It promises to be a helpful option for the right type of case to help move things along and clear up the backlog.  So far, what I know is that Binding JDR combines elements of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. The process is pursued in the courts with a judge that hears the settlement conference, and this same judge would be the one who hears the modified trial.  I wrote about settlement conferences in a previous post. This project has been tried with success in other regions in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Finding the Right Family Law Lawyer - A Follow up Thought

What I've Learned Something I've learned is that it's so important to take a prospective client through the estimated costs of pursuing a legal matter. There will usually be turns in the road. Photo credit: Jiang Hua While the costs are still estimates, a frank discussion between lawyer and prospective client prior to deciding on a retainer is crucial to a person's satisfaction level. Also, it's crucial to understanding whether it's a good fit.  The costs of litigation can mushroom in a short time because there are so many things that are out of your lawyer's control, such as how a court will decide a procedural matter or what the other side will do. The expectations that are set early on will greatly impact the equality of your working relationship with your lawyer. You should be looking for this when on the initial consultation. I believe that in the intake phone call or questionnaire that you may be asked to fill out would not be the right time to discuss...
Post a Comment
Read more