Skip to main content

A New Path to Resolving Disputes: Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution

Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution

Recently, I attended an opening of the courts ceremony in London where judges of the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice were speaking. The local administrative judge for London updated the audience and said that the London family court branch would soon begin piloting an innovative way to move certain cases toward resolution. 

A new path toward resolution of your case - binding judicial alternative dispute resolution

Photo credit: Tyler Lastovich

It’s called binding judicial dispute resolution (Binding JDR). It promises to be a helpful option for the right type of case to help move things along and clear up the backlog. 

So far, what I know is that Binding JDR combines elements of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. The process is pursued in the courts with a judge that hears the settlement conference, and this same judge would be the one who hears the modified trial. 

I wrote about settlement conferences in a previous post.

This project has been tried with success in other regions in Ontario, and I’ll be posting about more details soon. 

Right now it seems that this could be thought of as similar to a mediation-arbitration. This form of alternative dispute resolution is done out of court and allows the parties to craft their own procedures for presenting their evidence, and it allows them to choose their own mediator who would then put on an arbitrator’s hat if there’s no agreement during the mediation segment. I’ll write about mediation and arbitration separately in a future post.

On balance this is great news for Middlesex county divorce litigants because it provides a new option for expediting your matter in court and shows that we have a judiciary that is working hard to find ways to address the growing number of parties seeking relief.

Find a family law lawyer serving Middlesex, Elgin, Lambton, and Oxford counties

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Coming to a Court Near You: Dogimony for "Companion Animals"

New BC Law Changes How Pets Are Divided Up in Divorce & Family Law Cases Yesterday I had the pleasure of accepting Kristy Cameron's invitation to join her on her radio show in Ottawa to weigh in on the recent changes to the Family Law Act in British Columbia . You can find her show at iHeart Radio 580 CFRA News Talk Radio . One of my favourite parts of the show was when Kristy and her producer Chris coined the word "dogimony." It was on the topic of how the ownership and possession of pets is now decided in British Columbia courts. Photo credit: Yuliya Strizhkina. A pet's best interests are now one of the principles a BC judge must consider when deciding which party gets ownership and possession of the companion animal. The relationship a child has with the pet and the relationship the other spouse has are also required considerations. It's like a combined best interest of the pet + stakeholder principle.  What are the changes in s 92 and s 97 of BC’s Family L...

Finding the Right Family Law Lawyer - A Follow up Thought

What I've Learned Something I've learned is that it's so important to take a prospective client through the estimated costs of pursuing a legal matter. There will usually be turns in the road. Photo credit: Jiang Hua While the costs are still estimates, a frank discussion between lawyer and prospective client prior to deciding on a retainer is crucial to a person's satisfaction level. Also, it's crucial to understanding whether it's a good fit.  The costs of litigation can mushroom in a short time because there are so many things that are out of your lawyer's control, such as how a court will decide a procedural matter or what the other side will do. The expectations that are set early on will greatly impact the equality of your working relationship with your lawyer. You should be looking for this when on the initial consultation. I believe that in the intake phone call or questionnaire that you may be asked to fill out would not be the right time to discuss...