Skip to main content

Is There a Time Limit to Make a Spousal Support Claim?

Limitations vs. Delay in Seeking Spousal Support

One thing you should always discuss with your lawyer early on - preferably at the first consultation - is whether there is a time limit to collect a certain sum of money. In law, there are limitations periods to consider and there is delay. 


Hourglass signifying time limits - photo by Jordan Benton
Photo credit: Jordan Benson


What is a Limitations Period?

A limitations period means that you have only a certain amount of time to bring someone to court to get something that you believe you are owed. After the time is up, you can't get any relief on that issue.

Ontario law sets up certain time limits for certain types of claims. In divorce and family law situations, generally the time limit to make a court application for a property matter is up to 2 years after a divorce, or 6 years after a separation, whichever comes first.

For example, if a person and their spouse separate on January 1, 2023, and they own a house and cars together and dispute how much money one of them is owed, but they still haven't resolved the issue by December 31, 2028, one can't bring the other to court for recovering his or her property interest.

Signifying Extinguished right - photo by Rafael Quaty

Photo credit: Rafael Quaty

Is there a Time Limit for Collecting Spousal Support?

The Limitations Act specifically says that limitations periods like the one I described above do not apply to spousal support. So, there is no set 2-year, 6-year, or any fixed period to seek support. 

For those who seek support, this is good news because you can bring a court proceeding (or negotiate with the knowledge that one could go to court) even many years after. 

For those who are concerned their former spouse will come out of the woodwork in ten or twenty years, this could be disconcerting news. I get it.

photo by Laura Stanley

Photo credit: Laura Stanley

Is there no limit on how much a person can delay before suing for support?

The courts have developed law around delay for bringing court proceedings to collect on spousal support.

In cases where a person has delayed a long time to bring an application for spousal support, a court would examine the length of time. If the length of time is considerable, say, 10 years +, this would probably diminish the claim or could cancel it out. Generally, the longer the delay, the weaker the claim becomes.

The term "excessive delay" is sometimes used by judges in the caselaw to describe an amount of time that shows that a person who is making the claim did not have a reasonable expectation of getting support at the time the marriage or relationship ended. 

Another factor a judge would look at is the person's financial behaviour during the relationship or thereafter. For example, if the seeker of support did not pay his or her share of the mortgage and repairs, and this can be proved by the other spouse, this could weaken the seeker's claim to support down the road.

A court would also examine the extent, if any, of the economic integration of the estranged spouses after the date of separation, or even after the date they got divorced. For example, if for many years after separation or divorce the spouses stayed financially interdependent (e.g. with joint bank accounts and joint lines of credit) this would strengthen the seeker's claim to support. If, on the other hand, there was a clean break since the date of separation, this would weaken a seeker's claim.

The health and mental condition of the seeker of support can be a factors that influence a judge's decision.

These are just some factors of what you could speak with your divorce or family law lawyer about when it comes to your own situation.

photo by Cottonbro Studio
Photo credit: CottonBro Studio

Karlovic v Karlovic, 2018 ONSC 4233

In one court decision, the husband made a court application for spousal support 13 years after he and his wife had separated. The judge decided that the estranged husband was not owed any spousal support. These are some of the reasons given:

  • the marriage duration was considered "medium"
  • they were separated for about as long as they were married
  • the husband had not adopted a role during the relationship that impaired his ability to earn income
  • there was little to no financial interdependence between the two people after separation
  • the husband did not assist the estranged wife to pay off the balance of the mortgage
  • the two people ceased using joint accounts long before they separated
  • no evidence of the husband taking on childcare responsibilities
  • the estranged wife's post-separation increases in income came from her own post-separation efforts.


Speak with a divorce & family lawyer to discuss spousal support for your situation


Labels:
Location: London, ON, Canada

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coming to a Court Near You: Dogimony for "Companion Animals"

New BC Law Changes How Pets Are Divided Up in Divorce & Family Law Cases Yesterday I had the pleasure of accepting Kristy Cameron's invitation to join her on her radio show in Ottawa to weigh in on the recent changes to the Family Law Act in British Columbia . You can find her show at iHeart Radio 580 CFRA News Talk Radio . One of my favourite parts of the show was when Kristy and her producer Chris coined the word "dogimony." It was on the topic of how the ownership and possession of pets is now decided in British Columbia courts. Photo credit: Yuliya Strizhkina. A pet's best interests are now one of the principles a BC judge must consider when deciding which party gets ownership and possession of the companion animal. The relationship a child has with the pet and the relationship the other spouse has are also required considerations. It's like a combined best interest of the pet + stakeholder principle.  What are the changes in s 92 and s 97 of BC’s Family L...
Post a Comment
Read more

A New Path to Resolving Disputes: Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution

Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution Recently, I attended an opening of the courts ceremony in London where judges of the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice were speaking. The local administrative judge for London updated the audience and said that the London family court branch would soon begin piloting an innovative way to move certain cases toward resolution.  Photo credit: Tyler Lastovich It’s called binding judicial dispute resolution (Binding JDR). It promises to be a helpful option for the right type of case to help move things along and clear up the backlog.  So far, what I know is that Binding JDR combines elements of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. The process is pursued in the courts with a judge that hears the settlement conference, and this same judge would be the one who hears the modified trial.  I wrote about settlement conferences in a previous post. This project has been tried with success in other regions in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Finding the Right Family Law Lawyer - A Follow up Thought

What I've Learned Something I've learned is that it's so important to take a prospective client through the estimated costs of pursuing a legal matter. There will usually be turns in the road. Photo credit: Jiang Hua While the costs are still estimates, a frank discussion between lawyer and prospective client prior to deciding on a retainer is crucial to a person's satisfaction level. Also, it's crucial to understanding whether it's a good fit.  The costs of litigation can mushroom in a short time because there are so many things that are out of your lawyer's control, such as how a court will decide a procedural matter or what the other side will do. The expectations that are set early on will greatly impact the equality of your working relationship with your lawyer. You should be looking for this when on the initial consultation. I believe that in the intake phone call or questionnaire that you may be asked to fill out would not be the right time to discuss...
Post a Comment
Read more