Skip to main content

Marriage Contracts: Pre- or Post-nuptial Agreements?

Marriage Contracts

These contracts are for those who are planning to get married (pre-nuptial/pre-wedding) or are already married (marriage contract). Although it should be noted that in Ontario law we only have a 'marriage contract,' and this can be signed by a couple before or after their wedding. 

This type of contract allows a couple to agree on property or support. They can agree on different terms that what the default law may dictate in the event of a breakdown of the marriage. 

For example, Ontario's Family Law Act has special rules for dividing what is called the "matrimonial home." Each spouse receives an equal share, regardless of who paid more of the expenses such as the down payment or mortgage loan. 

But with a marriage contract, a couple can agree to a different division of the matrimonial home's value if the relationship were to end. This contracting power is especially valuable to those who have already been divorced once or are on their second or third marriage and approaching retirement. They want to ensure that what is left of their assets (which have already been through prior divisions) will be preserved for their use.

Marriage contracts are also used to address specific issues such as debts incurred prior to marriage, family wealth that may be received from a parent's business, or looking after children from a prior relationship or your pets.

Your marriage contract, pre- or post-nup., can state who keeps the pet(s). More about our dear pets in a future post.


Photo credit: Anastasia Sharaeva

Find a family law lawyer serving London and Middlesex

Get details about the London (Middlesex County) Courthouse

Labels:
Location: London, ON, Canada

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coming to a Court Near You: Dogimony for "Companion Animals"

New BC Law Changes How Pets Are Divided Up in Divorce & Family Law Cases Yesterday I had the pleasure of accepting Kristy Cameron's invitation to join her on her radio show in Ottawa to weigh in on the recent changes to the Family Law Act in British Columbia . You can find her show at iHeart Radio 580 CFRA News Talk Radio . One of my favourite parts of the show was when Kristy and her producer Chris coined the word "dogimony." It was on the topic of how the ownership and possession of pets is now decided in British Columbia courts. Photo credit: Yuliya Strizhkina. A pet's best interests are now one of the principles a BC judge must consider when deciding which party gets ownership and possession of the companion animal. The relationship a child has with the pet and the relationship the other spouse has are also required considerations. It's like a combined best interest of the pet + stakeholder principle.  What are the changes in s 92 and s 97 of BC’s Family L...
Post a Comment
Read more

A New Path to Resolving Disputes: Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution

Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution Recently, I attended an opening of the courts ceremony in London where judges of the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice were speaking. The local administrative judge for London updated the audience and said that the London family court branch would soon begin piloting an innovative way to move certain cases toward resolution.  Photo credit: Tyler Lastovich It’s called binding judicial dispute resolution (Binding JDR). It promises to be a helpful option for the right type of case to help move things along and clear up the backlog.  So far, what I know is that Binding JDR combines elements of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. The process is pursued in the courts with a judge that hears the settlement conference, and this same judge would be the one who hears the modified trial.  I wrote about settlement conferences in a previous post. This project has been tried with success in other regions in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Finding the Right Family Law Lawyer - A Follow up Thought

What I've Learned Something I've learned is that it's so important to take a prospective client through the estimated costs of pursuing a legal matter. There will usually be turns in the road. Photo credit: Jiang Hua While the costs are still estimates, a frank discussion between lawyer and prospective client prior to deciding on a retainer is crucial to a person's satisfaction level. Also, it's crucial to understanding whether it's a good fit.  The costs of litigation can mushroom in a short time because there are so many things that are out of your lawyer's control, such as how a court will decide a procedural matter or what the other side will do. The expectations that are set early on will greatly impact the equality of your working relationship with your lawyer. You should be looking for this when on the initial consultation. I believe that in the intake phone call or questionnaire that you may be asked to fill out would not be the right time to discuss...
Post a Comment
Read more