The Family Law Court Process: Step 3

The Family Law Court Process: Step 3 - The Reply

A possible third step in the family law or divorce court process is the Reply. I say it's possible because a Reply is only made when the respondent makes an Answer that raises new claims. In that case, the applicant can respond to only the new claims.

Similar to the application and the answer, the Reply will set out the applicant's response to the new issue(s) raised by the respondent. But if the responding person does not raise new issues in his or her Answer, the applicant does not make a Reply.

A Reply can be lengthy and your family law lawyer will write the response with your input. The costs associated with making a Reply are approximately the same as the other main documents -- $3500 to $5000 -- depending on the length of the response and the complexity of gathering information needed to respond to the new claims.

Photo credit: Olya Harytovich

A Reply can be made only by the applicant. So if you are considering starting a court proceeding, it is helpful to consult a family law lawyer well in advance. This will help you to understand the probable costs ahead of time and form expectations accordingly. The closer your expectations are attuned to reality, the better the experience will be for you.

Find a Family Law Lawyer, or Separation Lawyer or Divorce Lawyer, who serves clients in London, St. Thomas, Stratford, or Sarnia, Ontario.

Comments

Finding the Right Family Law Lawyer - A Follow up Thought

What I've Learned Something I've learned is that it's so important to take a prospective client through the estimated costs of pursuing a legal matter. There will usually be turns in the road. Photo credit: Jiang Hua While the costs are still estimates, a frank discussion between lawyer and prospective client prior to deciding on a retainer is crucial to a person's satisfaction level. Also, it's crucial to understanding whether it's a good fit. The costs of litigation can mushroom in a short time because there are so many things that are out of your lawyer's control, such as how a court will decide a procedural matter or what the other side will do. The expectations that are set early on will greatly impact the equality of your working relationship with your lawyer. You should be looking for this when on the initial consultation. I believe that in the intake phone call or questionnaire that you may be asked to fill out would not be the right time to discuss...

Is There a Time Limit to Make a Spousal Support Claim?

Limitations vs. Delay in Seeking Spousal Support One thing you should always discuss with your lawyer early on - preferably at the first consultation - is whether there is a time limit to collect a certain sum of money. In law, there are limitations periods to consider and there is delay. Photo credit: Jordan Benson What is a Limitations Period? A limitations period means that you have only a certain amount of time to bring someone to court to get something that you believe you are owed. After the time is up, you can't get any relief on that issue. Ontario law sets up certain time limits for certain types of claims. In divorce and family law situations, generally the time limit to make a court application for a property matter is up to 2 years after a divorce, or 6 years after a separation, whichever comes first. For example, if a person and their spouse separate on January 1, 2023, and they own a house and cars together and dispute how much money one of them is owed, but they sti...

A New Path to Resolving Disputes: Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution

Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution Recently, I attended an opening of the courts ceremony in London where judges of the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice were speaking. The local administrative judge for London updated the audience and said that the London family court branch would soon begin piloting an innovative way to move certain cases toward resolution. Photo credit: Tyler Lastovich It’s called binding judicial dispute resolution (Binding JDR). It promises to be a helpful option for the right type of case to help move things along and clear up the backlog. So far, what I know is that Binding JDR combines elements of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. The process is pursued in the courts with a judge that hears the settlement conference, and this same judge would be the one who hears the modified trial. I wrote about settlement conferences in a previous post. This project has been tried with success in other regions in...

Isaac's Family Law Blog

Search This Blog