Skip to main content

Steps in the Family Law Court Process: Step 5 - The Settlement Conference

Family Law Court Process - The Settlement Conference

In previous articles, I wrote about what you could expect at early stages of the family law court process. The procedure is that after a case conference and possibly a motion, another pre-trial hearing called a settlement conference is scheduled. At times a settlement conference can be combined with a case conference, but often a settlement conference will be held separately and after all disclosure has been made. A matter cannot proceed to trial without having held a settlement conference.

What Can I Expect at My Settlement Conference?

A settlement conference is intended to promote resolution of the issues after all financial disclosure and reporting has been made to the parties and the court. With the benefit of the entire picture, a judge at a settlement conference is in a position to provide a judicial opinion that gives each party a solid assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of their claims.

If one party has not made complete financial disclosure by the date of the settlement conference, the hearing will turn into a de facto case conference for a second time. A judge would order the person who did not disclose what was necessary to provide whatever items are outstanding by a certain date. The party that has not disclosed their entire picture as requested may also have to pay a percentage of the other party’s legal costs for the wasted conference time.

The old London, Ontario courthouse

The Old London, Ontario Courthouse

What You'll Need to Do with Your Lawyer

Part of my preparation with my clients is to get updates on their situation as I draft a document called a settlement conference brief. Important facts need to be gathered and perhaps a reasonable offer to settle should be discussed and made to the other side in time for them to consider it before the conference. The settlement conference brief is served on the other party and filed with the court. 

Before the conference, the judge will review the briefs to understand the issues and the alleged facts to provide informed guidance at the hearing. The Family Law Rules also require your lawyer to file and serve a confirmation form.

The objectives of the settlement conference are to:

  • Confirming that all relevant disclosure has been made;
  • Explore the chances of settling the issues and narrowing down the number of issues; and
  • Get a judge’s opinion of how a motion judge or trial judge would decide an issue. (The words I like to hear are, "Well, Mr. Smith, if I were deciding this at trial, I would...")

The types of orders that a judge can make at a settlement conference are made with the consent of both parties. No binding decision will be made on a substantive matter in your case unless it's agreed to by both parties. If disclosure remains outstanding or has not yet been ordered, the court can make orders in that regard. If a party attends a settlement conference unprepared, the court may make a costs order in favour of the other party. If costs are awarded, it's usually a percentage of the total, often about 20-30%.

If a judge at a settlement conference gives his or her opinion on how an issue would be decided at trial, this would bar that particular judge from presiding over the trial if you reach that step. The reason behind this rule is that because of having candid, settlement discussions with each party at a conference, the judge will not be able to provide unbiased adjudication later at trial.

The Best Part of the Settlement Conference

Arguably, the most valuable aspect of a settlement conference is the potential for receiving a candid judicial opinion. To maximize the chances that the judge will provide a thorough opinion on the issues, ensure that you work diligently with your lawyer to provide all the requested disclosure to the other party well in advance of the conference date. Failure to disclosure your economic and financial picture may result in no judicial opinion given and you may have to pay some of the other party’s costs.

If you would like to discuss your matter and receive advice on how to proceed, please feel free to schedule a consultation with me: isaac@drakelaw.ca or (548) 866-9997 ext. 104.

Find a family law lawyer or divorce lawyer serving London and Middlesex County.

Get familiar with a 17C settlement conference brief form

Settlement conferences are held in person, and here are the details to get to the London courthouse
Labels:
Location: London, ON, Canada

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coming to a Court Near You: Dogimony for "Companion Animals"

New BC Law Changes How Pets Are Divided Up in Divorce & Family Law Cases Yesterday I had the pleasure of accepting Kristy Cameron's invitation to join her on her radio show in Ottawa to weigh in on the recent changes to the Family Law Act in British Columbia . You can find her show at iHeart Radio 580 CFRA News Talk Radio . One of my favourite parts of the show was when Kristy and her producer Chris coined the word "dogimony." It was on the topic of how the ownership and possession of pets is now decided in British Columbia courts. Photo credit: Yuliya Strizhkina. A pet's best interests are now one of the principles a BC judge must consider when deciding which party gets ownership and possession of the companion animal. The relationship a child has with the pet and the relationship the other spouse has are also required considerations. It's like a combined best interest of the pet + stakeholder principle.  What are the changes in s 92 and s 97 of BC’s Family L...
Post a Comment
Read more

A New Path to Resolving Disputes: Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution

Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution Recently, I attended an opening of the courts ceremony in London where judges of the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice were speaking. The local administrative judge for London updated the audience and said that the London family court branch would soon begin piloting an innovative way to move certain cases toward resolution.  Photo credit: Tyler Lastovich It’s called binding judicial dispute resolution (Binding JDR). It promises to be a helpful option for the right type of case to help move things along and clear up the backlog.  So far, what I know is that Binding JDR combines elements of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. The process is pursued in the courts with a judge that hears the settlement conference, and this same judge would be the one who hears the modified trial.  I wrote about settlement conferences in a previous post. This project has been tried with success in other regions in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Finding the Right Family Law Lawyer - A Follow up Thought

What I've Learned Something I've learned is that it's so important to take a prospective client through the estimated costs of pursuing a legal matter. There will usually be turns in the road. Photo credit: Jiang Hua While the costs are still estimates, a frank discussion between lawyer and prospective client prior to deciding on a retainer is crucial to a person's satisfaction level. Also, it's crucial to understanding whether it's a good fit.  The costs of litigation can mushroom in a short time because there are so many things that are out of your lawyer's control, such as how a court will decide a procedural matter or what the other side will do. The expectations that are set early on will greatly impact the equality of your working relationship with your lawyer. You should be looking for this when on the initial consultation. I believe that in the intake phone call or questionnaire that you may be asked to fill out would not be the right time to discuss...
Post a Comment
Read more