Skip to main content

The Family Law Court Process: Step 2 - The Answer

Family Law Court Process: Step 2 - The Answer

If you've made an application or a motion to change, the other party will have to make an answer ("Form 10 Answer"). Alternatively, if you've been served with an application or motion to change, you will have to make an answer, unless you do not wish to defend your position. In that case, the other party can obtain a summary hearing to deal with his or her claims more quickly against you.


In most cases an answer is made. Think of an answer as the family law version of a statement of defence. It responds to the claims made in the application or motion to change. It alleges new facts that the responding party is using to support its position. The answer also has a section in which the responding party can make claims of its own with alleged facts to support those new claims.

If you are the respondent (the one making the answer), you'll generally have to also prepare a financial statement. In family law, even if property is not in dispute, income is relevant to other issues, such as a parent's ability to pay for the children's needs if that parent is asking for primary care of the child. The party making the application would have likely had to file and serve a financial statement, as well. I'll write about financial disclosure in other posts. 

The legal fees for making an answer are approximately what they are for making an application or motion to change. The costs rise as you increase the complexity and number of the claims, but they generally work out to be in the range of about $3,500 to $5,000 per answer.

Your family law lawyer will work with you to gather all the disclosure you need to make a financial statement and will guide you through the process of gathering the facts necessary to support the positions you want to take. Your lawyer would also advise you on what claims you can make or should make and their chances of success.

Find a Family Law Lawyer or Divorce Lawyer in Southwestern Ontario: St. Thomas, Kitchener, Waterloo, London, Sarnia, Stratford, Brantford.

Labels:
Location: London, ON, Canada

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coming to a Court Near You: Dogimony for "Companion Animals"

New BC Law Changes How Pets Are Divided Up in Divorce & Family Law Cases Yesterday I had the pleasure of accepting Kristy Cameron's invitation to join her on her radio show in Ottawa to weigh in on the recent changes to the Family Law Act in British Columbia . You can find her show at iHeart Radio 580 CFRA News Talk Radio . One of my favourite parts of the show was when Kristy and her producer Chris coined the word "dogimony." It was on the topic of how the ownership and possession of pets is now decided in British Columbia courts. Photo credit: Yuliya Strizhkina. A pet's best interests are now one of the principles a BC judge must consider when deciding which party gets ownership and possession of the companion animal. The relationship a child has with the pet and the relationship the other spouse has are also required considerations. It's like a combined best interest of the pet + stakeholder principle.  What are the changes in s 92 and s 97 of BC’s Family L...
Post a Comment
Read more

A New Path to Resolving Disputes: Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution

Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution Recently, I attended an opening of the courts ceremony in London where judges of the Ontario Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Justice were speaking. The local administrative judge for London updated the audience and said that the London family court branch would soon begin piloting an innovative way to move certain cases toward resolution.  Photo credit: Tyler Lastovich It’s called binding judicial dispute resolution (Binding JDR). It promises to be a helpful option for the right type of case to help move things along and clear up the backlog.  So far, what I know is that Binding JDR combines elements of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. The process is pursued in the courts with a judge that hears the settlement conference, and this same judge would be the one who hears the modified trial.  I wrote about settlement conferences in a previous post. This project has been tried with success in other regions in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is There a Time Limit to Make a Spousal Support Claim?

Limitations vs. Delay in Seeking Spousal Support One thing you should always discuss with your lawyer early on - preferably at the first consultation - is whether there is a time limit to collect a certain sum of money. In law, there are limitations periods to consider and there is delay.  Photo credit: Jordan Benson What is a Limitations Period? A limitations period means that you have only a certain amount of time to bring someone to court to get something that you believe you are owed. After the time is up, you can't get any relief on that issue. Ontario law sets up certain time limits for certain types of claims. In divorce and family law situations, generally the time limit to make a court application for a property matter is up to 2 years after a divorce, or 6 years after a separation, whichever comes first. For example, if a person and their spouse separate on January 1, 2023, and they own a house and cars together and dispute how much money one of them is owed, but they sti...
Post a Comment
Read more