Skip to main content

The Family Law Court Process: Step 2 - The Answer

Family Law Court Process: Step 2 - The Answer

If you've made an application or a motion to change, the other party will have to make an answer ("Form 10 Answer"). Alternatively, if you've been served with an application or motion to change, you will have to make an answer, unless you do not wish to defend your position. In that case, the other party can obtain a summary hearing to deal with his or her claims more quickly against you.


In most cases an answer is made. Think of an answer as the family law version of a statement of defence. It responds to the claims made in the application or motion to change. It alleges new facts that the responding party is using to support its position. The answer also has a section in which the responding party can make claims of its own with alleged facts to support those new claims.

If you are the respondent (the one making the answer), you'll generally have to also prepare a financial statement. In family law, even if property is not in dispute, income is relevant to other issues, such as a parent's ability to pay for the children's needs if that parent is asking for primary care of the child. The party making the application would have likely had to file and serve a financial statement, as well. I'll write about financial disclosure in other posts. 

The legal fees for making an answer are approximately what they are for making an application or motion to change. The costs rise as you increase the complexity and number of the claims, but they generally work out to be in the range of about $3,500 to $5,000 per answer.

Your family law lawyer will work with you to gather all the disclosure you need to make a financial statement and will guide you through the process of gathering the facts necessary to support the positions you want to take. Your lawyer would also advise you on what claims you can make or should make and their chances of success.

Find a Family Law Lawyer or Divorce Lawyer in Southwestern Ontario: St. Thomas, Kitchener, Waterloo, London, Sarnia, Stratford, Brantford.

Labels:
Location: London, ON, Canada

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution - Past Pilots

Courts that Have Tried Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution On May 14, 2021, a pilot was started to test whether a new type of dispute resolution would help people in a family law court dispute, while at the same time clearing the backlog in the courts. Binding Judicial Dispute Resolution (Binding JDR) was started in Simcoe and Muskoka. In March 2022,  it was extended to Peterborough, Lindsay and Cobourg. It has also since been extended to Kitchener-Waterloo. In the pilot, both sides had to voluntarily agree to take this path toward a settlement or judicial decision in their case - instead of following the regular procedure. Binding JDR is a hybrid animal with certain features of a settlement conference and elements of a trial. Photo credit: Sora Shimazaki What is a Settlement Conference? To recap my previous post , a settlement conference is an informal hearing that allows both sides to get an opinion from a judge as to how he or she would decide the case if it were at trial. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Finding the Right Family Law Lawyer - A Follow up Thought

What I've Learned Something I've learned is that it's so important to take a prospective client through the estimated costs of pursuing a legal matter. There will usually be turns in the road. Photo credit: Jiang Hua While the costs are still estimates, a frank discussion between lawyer and prospective client prior to deciding on a retainer is crucial to a person's satisfaction level. Also, it's crucial to understanding whether it's a good fit.  The costs of litigation can mushroom in a short time because there are so many things that are out of your lawyer's control, such as how a court will decide a procedural matter or what the other side will do. The expectations that are set early on will greatly impact the equality of your working relationship with your lawyer. You should be looking for this when on the initial consultation. I believe that in the intake phone call or questionnaire that you may be asked to fill out would not be the right time to discuss...
1 comment
Read more

Coming to a Court Near You: Dogimony for "Companion Animals"

New BC Law Changes How Pets Are Divided Up in Divorce & Family Law Cases Yesterday I had the pleasure of accepting Kristy Cameron's invitation to join her on her radio show in Ottawa to weigh in on the recent changes to the Family Law Act in British Columbia . You can find her show at iHeart Radio 580 CFRA News Talk Radio . One of my favourite parts of the show was when Kristy and her producer Chris coined the word "dogimony." It was on the topic of how the ownership and possession of pets is now decided in British Columbia courts. Photo credit: Yuliya Strizhkina. A pet's best interests are now one of the principles a BC judge must consider when deciding which party gets ownership and possession of the companion animal. The relationship a child has with the pet and the relationship the other spouse has are also required considerations. It's like a combined best interest of the pet + stakeholder principle.  What are the changes in s 92 and s 97 of BC’s Family L...
Post a Comment
Read more